quotes on respect

quotes on respect. These quotes are hilarious in
  • These quotes are hilarious in



  • sikuss
    Apr 8, 07:28 PM
    Refurbed iPad1 after I gave my previous ipad to my grandmother to use

    http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/apple-ipad-official-04.jpg





    quotes on respect. quotes on respect. quotes
  • quotes on respect. quotes



  • VictoriaStudent
    Mar 17, 02:32 AM
    :rolleyes: Good luck getting anywhere with that.

    not trying to go anywhere with it. I don't particularly care what happens to our "friend." I just find his arrogance horrendous.





    quotes on respect. Respect The Egg Roll Mousepad
  • Respect The Egg Roll Mousepad



  • *LTD*
    Mar 9, 07:15 AM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8C148)

    I think we can all agree that this... heh... is rather unique and not made by Apple.

    http://lh5.ggpht.com/_zfOFsCjCm-c/TNf0n3KqxGI/AAAAAAAAA4Y/5bac55lt2uk/dell-tablet-flip-small.jpg

    LOL you got that right . . . http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/3879/34067841.jpg





    quotes on respect. quotes about respect
  • quotes about respect



  • BlueRevolution
    Oct 28, 02:36 PM
    That's hardly surprising. I'm more interested in the 100% legal bit - it's interesting that Apple hasn't yet moved to explicitly ban running OS X on non-Apple hardware.





    quotes on respect. quotes about respect
  • quotes about respect



  • Dalton63841
    Apr 27, 03:25 AM
    komodrone
    13 hours ago at 12:39 pm

    "...in total penetration" THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID. yeah I signed up for an account just to post this.

    Rating: 10 Positives / 0 Negatives

    It saddens me that THIS got more votes than many actual substantial posts...





    quotes on respect. quotes about kindness
  • quotes about kindness



  • whooleytoo
    Apr 13, 08:04 AM
    That again? You do realize that 9/11 had very little to do with airport security but everything to do with incompetence on the side of the secret service and negligence on the side of the US government? TSA has not made airtravel any safer than prior to 9/11.

    The secret service might get lucky and stop a terrorist organisation before they do any harm, but they can do nothing to prevent a nutter getting on a plane if he doesn't have any record. It's up to the airport security to limit the weapons available to him on the plane, it's the best they can do.

    And it's up to everyone to decide what the 'best balance' is between privacy and safety. One thing is certain - the TSA (or any other airport authorities around the world) are always wrong: searches like this are wrong/if a weapon slips through and is used in a hijacking they're wrong.





    quotes on respect. quotes for respect
  • quotes for respect



  • tkermit
    Apr 5, 03:27 PM
    That's so awesome! :D




















    NOT! :rolleyes:





    quotes on respect. quotes for respect
  • quotes for respect



  • redalpha
    Sep 12, 08:59 AM
    http://www.apple.com/nl/quicktime/mac.html

    Left Bottom (Itunes Videos)

    iTunes-video's

    Transporter 2Transporter 2
    20th Century Fox

    Red EyeRed Eye
    Dreamworks S.K.G.

    World of Warcraft Burning CrusadeWorld of Warcraft Burning Crusade

    Enigmo2Enigmo 2





    quotes on respect. respect.mp4 video by
  • respect.mp4 video by



  • dwarnecke11
    Jul 21, 10:27 AM
    The antenna issue is real. It is more pronounced on the iPhone 4 than other smartphones because it is directly exposed to touch.

    That said, Apple is defending the notion that this problem does in fact affect nearly all phones to some degree. They show evidence and catalog it very clearly. What's wrong with that?

    What upsets me more is the backlash from those companies denying the issue altogether - denying an issue that these videos and others clearly show. Shouldn't this denial be more worrisome?





    quotes on respect. “Self-respect is
  • “Self-respect is



  • jshrager
    Sep 12, 05:20 AM
    the distribution rights are totally different for movies.

    when a tv show comes out in the us the uk channels buy the rights from the us companies and this often means we don't get the shows in the UK for ages. and they don't come to ITunes in uk as it would be for apple to negotiate this with the uk tv company like channel 4.

    some films are released internationally at the same time and so are the DVDs thus there is no reason why these films can't be released on an ITMS in the US, UK and wherever else the DVD would be released worldwide on the same date.

    my cousin's an itunes lawyer working nr regents street store in london so she was explaining about tv shows to me....i'll try find out about the probs with movies if indeed the ITMS is released today and not in the UK.

    sound reasonable?





    quotes on respect. Quotes on Respect
  • Quotes on Respect



  • DavidLeblond
    Sep 12, 07:22 AM
    Aint it a bit early for that. With 5 hours to go before the event:confused: :confused:

    It's called hype, my friend.





    quotes on respect. respect quotes
  • respect quotes



  • Flowbee
    Oct 10, 06:44 PM
    Well, if Apple's going to do it this year, it will most likely be before the end of October. Much later than that and they'll miss a chunk of the holiday shopping season. Wanna grab people before they've ordered their Wiis and PS3s.





    quotes on respect. They respect their weaknesses
  • They respect their weaknesses



  • SkyStudios
    May 2, 12:44 PM
    Well I'm sure Steve Jobs could trot out the explanations given here and point out it is nothing right?

    Email him the argument that this is nothing and blown all out of proportion. He might have a news conference.

    I hate this because it feels like I am ridiculing Steve Jobs like the trolls that come on here. I am not. The world simply isn't black and white. And that is more the case with corporations than individuals.
    you want users to wste time emailing him when its a public concern world wide and he already answered with BS


    http://blogs.forbes.com/kashmirhill/2011/04/25/where-steve-jobs-stood-on-location-privacy-in-2010/

    portion of this story

    Since Apple is mum at the moment, it’s worth looking back on Apple’s views in the summer of 2010 when the company first started storing this file on people’s phones. The video is above. Here’s a transcript of Jobs’ response: Jobs points out that Apple doesn’t allow apps to get users’ location data without their express permission. Then he says:





    quotes on respect. quotes with respect to the
  • quotes with respect to the



  • Hankster
    Apr 25, 12:18 PM
    To better clarify what the arrows indicate, it may be beneficial to change the image into a thumbs up and thumbs down.





    quotes on respect. quotes on respect
  • quotes on respect



  • WildCowboy
    Jan 5, 09:35 AM
    There is also no guarantee that the link will be active during the keynote (aka live) .

    Oh, no...I don't think much of anyone expects there to be live coverage. They did away with that some time ago. But the QT archived video should be up within a few hours after the keynote ends.





    quotes on respect. quotes on respect
  • quotes on respect



  • Al Coholic
    May 3, 04:53 PM
    Ok, I'm taking down the names of all the carrier defenders here.

    The next time you people bitch about the cable companies or magazine publishers charging you twice for the "one" thing you paid for I'm gonna be all over you.





    quotes on respect. quotes about respect. Skipping exercises your happiness muscles. ~Jessi Lane Adams Adolescents are not monsters.
  • quotes about respect. Skipping exercises your happiness muscles. ~Jessi Lane Adams Adolescents are not monsters.



  • pondosinatra
    Sep 30, 09:26 AM
    He sure loves pocket doors...





    quotes on respect. quotes about respect
  • quotes about respect



  • darbus69
    May 4, 12:30 AM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)

    ur a nazi if u don't react positive to this ad, just wish apple didnt make me want so much stuff; I hate being a consumer of STUFF sometimes...





    quotes on respect. quotes on respect
  • quotes on respect



  • Rocketman
    Oct 28, 04:48 PM
    It's not necessarily illegal to run Darwin on non-Apple hardware, which is much of the goals of the OSx86 project. The source as it comes from Apple will only run on Apple hardware mainly due to EFI and some other stuff. The GUI is what seems to be so tied to the TPM circuitry, which is what OSx86 is NOT touching and why they say it's still legal.

    Maybe, but they explicitly mention TPM is available as a pirated item from bit torrent, and, the first high bandwidth mirror they added was located in CHINA, piracy central.

    It seems to me the point of the exercise from the point of view of the authors is to make a great hack. We can safely say they have accomplished that. They are now famous to a degree as well, even though they cannot spell worth a sh|t. At least they are stoned and insane :)

    The point of USERS of this, is to combine the legal hack with illegal TPM cracks, and combine them onto commodity hardware to run a MacOS environment without paying a dime to Apple whatsoever.

    Plenty of Apple high end software has been "cracked" so one can get it and use it for free if one is so inclined, or in the case of the Chinese, insulated from recourse by a sympathetic government.

    In the final analysis there is a vast number of people working hard to get past copyright and avoid paying the author for their work. That is illegal to some degree in every country, or at minimum, by treaty with the USA.

    I am not sure what tangible benefits have flowed to Apple by having the OS code as open source. It may be as simple as window dressing to attract developers who actually use Xcode anyway in the real world. But if there are any tangible benefits they have escaped my notice.

    Leopard will tightly couple TPM and do other tricks to further harden it, but somebody will crack it. If by no other means than by making a pirated ROM chip for hack motherboards.

    Meanwhile CPU sales are up 30%.

    Rocketman





    Proud Liberal
    Sep 12, 10:33 AM
    ...I know the media invite says "It's Showtime" and we know what the connotation is for that. But I find it interesting that the theater where the event is being held is done up with huge silhouette iPod ads, which doesn't really fit the "It's Showtime" theme, unless the new true video iPod is also going to be announced in conjunction with the movie download service. :confused: :confused: :confused:





    wpotere
    Apr 13, 11:26 AM
    No, my point was to scale it back to what it was before 9/11 and maintain both domestic and international security at the pre 9/11 level of international security.

    Before 9/11 I could walk right to my gate in several major airports.





    wlh99
    Apr 26, 08:59 PM
    After that I implement a Cancel method pointing to sender (button)

    So, my goal is to use 1 start button and 1 cancel button.. and just do their actions. I have set up a the start button to start both timers, obviously both start their countdown at the same time which is not good.

    I want to tell one timer to start and if I press cancel, invalidate it. Then If I press start again, call the second timer. (I do this because I read that you can't reuse a timer after you invalidate it).

    Some people have suggested to use Booleans like true or false, or conditions. What do you think?

    What if after pressing the start button, you create a timer and start it. Then pressing the cancel button invalidates and releases it. Then pressing the start button would create another timer, using the same pointer.

    Totally untested and probably broken code below, but should demonstrate the idea:


    -(IBAction)startButton:(id) sender {
    // myTimer is declared in header file ...

    if (myTimer!=nil) { // if the pointer already points to a timer, you don't want to create a second one without stoping and destroying the first

    [myTimer invalidate];
    [myTimer release];

    }

    // Now that we know myTimer doesn't point to a timer already..

    myTimer = [NSTimer scheduledTimerWithTimeInterval:aTimeInterval target:self selector:@selector(echoIt:) userInfo:myDict repeats:YES];
    [myTimer retain];
    }

    -(IBAction)cancelIt:(id) sender {
    [myTimer invalidate];
    [myTimer release]; // This timer is now gone, and you won't reuse it.
    }





    steelfist
    Nov 19, 05:57 AM
    it would mean backstabbing and betrayal if apple went with amd.





    bushido
    May 4, 09:32 AM
    Yes you do. It's called "don't sign the contract" Take it or leave it approaches are quite common in the world of contracts.

    Cell phones are not considered a human right that carriers must provide to everybody.

    thx god not every one has this attitude ... people were bitching about paying extra for tethering here and NO ONE even argued "but its in the contract BS" and boom, few months later it got changed. just bc something is in a obvs greedy network contract doesnt mean it shouldnt be changed or makes it right.

    this "i won't complain cuz i as one can't do anything about it anyway" approach makes me sick



    0 comments:

    Post a Comment